Sites: Africa, Marketing, Medical, Retail
Marketing community of Africa
Marketing> The Loerie Awards 2009, Advertising, Branding, Cinema, CRM, Design, Digital, Direct Marketing, Education & Training, Eventing, Exhibitions, Magazines, Media, Mobile, Newspapers, Online Media, Out Of Home, Printing, Production, Promotions, Public Relations, Radio, Recruitment, Research, Retail, Sales, Sponsorship, TV, Youth Marketing, 2010 FIFA World Cup
Comments

Comments on Fake ads. Worth the reward?
 
Interestering debacle
In my opinion, and it remains just that, I feel it's not just creatives' job to come up with and sell the idea but also the client service team. Part of the joy of collecting an award is knowing it was a team effort. EVERYONE pulled their weight and collected the award as a result. I think scam ads hurt us, and hurt brands.

But like I said, it's just my opinion.
29 Oct 2006 09:19   Reply, Report this comment
 
You've forgotten someone...  by  Geoff
Surely the client should also be responsible for producing great work? Basically, an ad should satisfy three needs:

·People's need for information or emotional satisfaction from a product / service

·Client's need to achieve their stated marketing objectives

·And the agency's need for publicity / fame to attract new business

Contrary to popular belief, fame and publicity does not only come from awards, though awards are obviously one source. It comes from having work talked about.

And having work talked about can only be good for our clients too.
30 Oct 2006 11:52   Reply, Report this comment
Hanging in Limbo - Kidd
There's always two sides to this story. Part of me feels very strongly that by entering a "fake ad" we have failed at the core purpose of our industry, which is advertising. We have simply reduced our communication to pieces of art. The ads themselves no longer serve to educate and inform but instead remain executed ideas , and nothing more.

Quickly jumping on the fence is the side of me that if given the choice between discarding an idea that the client would never run or executing it, running it in some small unknown publication and then submitting it for and award, i would go for the latter. This choice would probably be justified to myself as the frustration of seeing a good idea die seems a waste and that awards are a celebration of the creative idea more than anything else, all the while still carrying that pang of guilt that maybe, just maybe, all i've accomplished is a convincing con.
29 Nov 2006 16:53   Reply, Report this comment






LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This Message Board accepts no liability of legal consequences that arise from the Message Boards (e.g. libel, slander, or other such crimes). All posted messages are the sole property of their respective authors. The maintainer does retain the right to remove any message posts for whatever reasons. People that post messages to this forum are not to libel/slander nor in any other way depict a company, entity, individual(s), or service in a false light; should they do so, the legal consequences are theirs alone. Bizcommunity.com will disclose authors' IP addresses to authorities if compelled to do so by a court of law.
 











Receive free email newsletter
 
Tell a friend about us
 
CONTACT US | ABOUT US | SEND US NEWS | ADVERTISING RATES | sales@bizcommunity.com | +27 (0)21 680 3500
All rights reserved. © 2008. Bizcommunity.com, its sponsors, contributors and advertisers disclaim all liability for any loss, damage, injury or expense that might arise from the use of, or reliance upon, the services contained herein. Privacy policy, Terms of Use.
Connected by: Uninet