We've done enough damage. All we can do is send food
By: Simon Jenkins
Robert Mugabe is making a mockery of liberal interventionism. He has become God's gift to cartoonists, politicians and commentators. He is depicted wielding clubs dripping in blood. He stands triumphant over a pile of skulls. He is Bokassa out of Idi Amin out of Charles Taylor. He is that old familiar, the African heart of darkness, monstrous, buffoonish, grotesque and evil. If Britain, as Kipling jeered, were ever capable of "killing Kruger with your mouth", Mugabe would long be dead.
There is a sense in which Mugabe's hysterical anti-British analysis of his predicament is correct. His Zimbabwe is a creature of British imperialism and post-imperialism. The last governor, Lord Soames, regarded him as an affectionate regimental mascot, a "splendid chap", as he told me in an interview shortly before handing power to him in 1980.
Britain duly tolerated the suppression of Mugabe's enemy, Joshua Nkomo, and Zimbabwe's conversion into a one-party state. It turned a blind eye to the 1983 Ndebele massacre by Mugabe's Shona Fifth Brigade under its warlord, Perence Shiri, who some say is Mugabe's present master. Margaret Thatcher's Whitehall gave Harare lavish aid and barmy advice, helping turn a viable economy into a basket case of pseudo-socialist kleptomania - well charted by the Guardian's Andrew Meldrum in his memoir, Where We Have Hope.
Now Zimbabwe is declared outrageous. Though Mugabe is hardly the worst dictator in the world, he is regarded as "our" dictator and therefore our business. The public asks: "What is to be done about him?" Sated on having "done something", presumably glorious, about Bosnia, Sierra Leone, Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq, public opinion is hard-wired to such a question. So what is to be done?
Read the full article here.
Connected by: Uninet
muti
del.icio.us
stumbleupon
yahoo
google
facebook
newsvine
Digg
Reddit
GoGuide
