Sites: Africa, Marketing, Medical, Retail
Marketing community of Africa
Marketing> Advertising, Branding, Cinema, CRM, CSI, Design, Design Indaba 2009, Digital, Direct Marketing, Education & Training, Eventing, Exhibitions, Magazines, Media, Mobile, Newspapers, Online Media, Out Of Home, Printing, Production, Promotions, Public Relations, Radio, Recruitment, Research, Retail, Sales, Sponsorship, The Loerie Awards 2009, TV, Youth Marketing, 2010 FIFA World Cup
Articles
Advertising Articles

Creative Circle scraps current points system

The Creative Circle executive committee has decided unanimously to do away with the existing creative points system, but not an official creative circle agency table, Rob McLennan, chairman of the Creative Circle, clarified to members in an email yesterday, Monday, 15 September 2008.

McLennan pointed out that the circle is not abandoning its ranking, just the points, and that quality and quantity will now have equal weighting. Reasons given for the new system are:
Firstly, one of the reason's the points system was created was because various publications and others in the industry were creating their own points list which differed from each other, which created a bunch of confusion in the marketplace. So the idea was to standardise the points for all the endorsed awards festivals, and then for the creative circle to take ownership of that and release a yearly table by agency group and immediately after every endorsed award.

Clearly, this year, even with our points system, much confusion and, ahem, debate reigned post the last Loerie awards. The points system was interpreted in a number of different permutations by the industry and the agency groups, depending on how an agency or agency group wanted to swing it, compounded by the fact that an initial different Loerie points list was sent out first, followed by an official Creative Circle one.

Also, as everyone has pointed out, there has been a growing obsession with the point list. There has been debate over the points system and group vs. individual agency ranking than pretty much anything else at the exco's [sic], as opposed to figuring out how to make the work better. There have been more complaints over the amount of awards versus quality versus amount of points versus etc. than ever before.

So after seeing the Olympics table in the morning paper a little while ago, it struck us that their table is simple, works universally, without language, without caveats and explanations, and realised we'd possibly overcomplicated the issues with regards to the complex, interpretive, statistically heavy points system. By scanning the Olympic results table, one can immediately pick up who is the overall winner, and who has won the most golds, silvers etc, leaving everyone with a much clearer picture of who the strongest agency is in terms of quantity and quality.
MLennan stated that the Creative Circle will still endorse the same list of awards, which at this stage remains the same. It will also release a ratified table per endorsed award and an official yearly table from the Creative Circle for publishing, (including the Loeries awards). All of the award results will be issued and ranked as an agency group and then again as an individual agency.

The existing points system will remain until the end of the calendar year.

[16 Sep 2008 10:45]

 SEND TO A FRIEND  |   PRINT

 
Comment on this
 
• On another planet entirely!
    • Hear hear - The BALCK
• Actually the Olympics use points - like all other major sports competitions
• The King Has Spoken
• Silly
    • Zap! Bang! Wow!
        • Zap! Bang! Wow! - Nelly
• SOMEONE RESCUE THESE PEOPLE FROM THEMSELVES...!
• How it works - The reaper
    • Reaper, you know...
• eagles
• points
    • Cannes, D&AD, One Show


Share this page (Tell me more)


 





Receive free email newsletter
 
Tell a friend about us
 
CONTACT US | ABOUT US | SEND US NEWS | ADVERTISING RATES | sales@bizcommunity.com | +27 (0)21 680 3500
All rights reserved. © 2008. Bizcommunity.com, its sponsors, contributors and advertisers disclaim all liability for any loss, damage, injury or expense that might arise from the use of, or reliance upon, the services contained herein. Privacy policy, Terms of Use.
Connected by: Uninet